UNDERACHIEVING SINCE 1996.
T E A M C O W
  • Home
  • Blog

couldn't be helped

8/22/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
I'll never get tired of complaining about the frame design of the modern hardtail.  The simple, straight tubes on the old Marin on the bottom are just so much more elegant.

Curving the top tube on that newer Marin serves no function at all.  The curve in the down tube is dubious at best.  Old bikes never had it, and I don't think needed it either.  In all my years as a mechanic, I never saw damage on the down tube from the fork crown hitting it.

Damage on the top tube from the handlebar, sure - saw that all the time.  The bars probably hit way before the crank.

Maybe with today's short stems and stupidly wide bars that doesn't happen any more?
0 Comments

throwback thursday

8/21/2014

1 Comment

 
I'm seemingly never satisfied with the blog format that I've chosen, and as such, I have blog posts everywhere.  

So, because throwing back old posts (it just doesn't seem like the correct term does it?) is what the kids want these days (#TBT right?), here's a thing about tires I wrote three years ago.

'The only thing that never changes, is change.'

Cliche yes, but I don't know if you could describe mountain bike tires better in one sentence.

You could probably make a coffee table book of all the different tread patterns that have existed since mountain bikes really took off in the late 80's.  Scratch that - you could make a coffee table book of all the tread patterns that no longer exist since mountain biking got popular.  We saw all manner of "innovations" like tires designed to roll in a certain direction, tires meant to work on the front or on the rear, different rubber compounds, different sizes, and different colors.

Now I doubt anyone - other than me - would buy such a thing, but the point being that the general design of MTB tires is changing every year.

Why is this?

Did the hardpacked trails somehow get more slippery over the winter?  Did the gravel out there get upgraded?  Did the roots get, I don't know...  rootier??

I know that conditions on any given trail can change after years of use, but in general, we're still riding the same types of trails here in 2011 that we rode in 1990.  It's still dirt, rocks, roots, sand, and grass.
So why then does the Panaracer Smoke - generally accepted as the best tire of it's time - no longer work?  It must no longer work, because it's not fitted to new bikes anymore, right?

And the Onza Porcupine; did it have an expiration date that we didn't know about?  Did it's designers somehow know that by 1995, it just wouldn't grip the ground anymore?
Picture
Panaracer Smoke
Picture
OnZa Porcupine
The Panaracer Timbuk II, Fisher Fattrax, Ritchey Megabite, Specialized Ground Control, Klein Death Grip - all of these tires at some point just stopped working? 
Take a look at this page of Motocross tires - notice anything odd?

(hint - they're all the same!)

Now check this pic of a Yamaha from 1974;

Picture
Nearly 40 years later, and the tires are virtually identical.

How is it that Motocross tires haven't changed - at least in their tread pattern - for 40 years?

And why don't they have the dizzying array of different tread patterns like mountain bikes do?

I'll admit, I'm not immune to this.  A new set of tires and grips can go a long way to making your old bike feel new.  But, I just don't get why those old designs don't work anymore.

I think my Blizzard would really like a set of skinwall Ritchey Megabites.

What I can add to this post, three years later, is that I feel that we're reached a point where the fancy tread patterns are not selling anymore.  A lot of modern tires now generally look the same, and are generally a bunch of square blocks.  Just like motocross tires.

Of course the blocks are spread out more for damp conditions, closer together for hardpack trails, different widths, different rubber compounds, etc, etc.  

It's a small victory for function over fashion.
1 Comment

cross pollination

8/15/2014

0 Comments

 
If you walked into a bike shop in 1981, with no prior thought of what you really wanted, and said; "I'd like to buy a bike" you would have walked out with the bike on the right.

The ubiquitous "ten speed." 

Why?  Because that was the style at the time.

Picture
Raleigh. Maybe. I don't know. It really doesn't matter.
Picture
Cannondale SM1000
And if you walked into a shop in 1991, with no prior thought of what you really wanted, and said; "I'd like to buy a bike" you would have walked out with the bike on the left. 

The Mountain Bike.

Why?  Because it was the hot new thing at the time, and also because people realized that it was a lot more comfortable for just average riding.
Both of these bike are clearly meant for different purposes.  The road bike is for getting from one place to another, on smooth roads, as fast as possible.  The mountain bike is for getting from one place to another, over all manner of obstacles, as fast as possible.  That means that you need to move around on the bike, so it has be more compact, and have the rider more upright.

But, what if you could get the speed on paved trails with the comfort of the mountain bike? 

Read More
0 Comments

operation: strava domination

8/13/2014

0 Comments

 
Recently, I noticed that a local Twitter friend of mine rode the trail through Mill Creek, and completely obliterated my time on Strava.

I'm sure he's a nice guy and all, but if he thinks he can come into my hood, and start riding my trails...  

This will not stand.

I need to take back my trails, with Phase One - Dirt Domination.
Picture
1998 Dekerf Team ST
Because my preferred singletrack shredder is not yet ready to go, I needed to modify my Dekerf for trail duty.  

I've slapped on a used set of Conti Mountain Kings featuring several missing lugs and tubeless sealant residue.  I'll be going 2x9, with a crappy Exage front derailleur, mismatched RaceFace and Shimano rings, and a Grip Shift.

The rear derailleur is unchanged as a SRAM X.7 with a SRAM X.9 trigger shifter.  I've got a Mary handlebar, XTR brakes, and a RockShox SID that needs more air pressure in it.

Even at my fittest, I don't think I could ever run with the guys that are fast on Strava right now, so I know this is a fool's errand.  My goal though is to get Top 10 on at least one segment.

I should mention that I am not above creating my own segment to achieve this.

Stay tuned to this blog for results, and for Phase Two - Pavement Domination.
0 Comments

Irrational dislikes

8/1/2014

0 Comments

 
I have very strong opinions with regards to cycling.  A lot of them have very little basis in reality, most of them don't even matter.

But welcome to the Internet!  Every feeling that everyone has is somehow valid, no matter what.

Enjoy.

1. I refuse to acknowledge Bradley Wiggins' knighthood.  The guy is a jerk, period.  Also, not even born in the UK.

2. I refuse to acknowledge Chris Froome's knighthood.  Oh wait - he doesn't have that.  I just wanted to mention him because he was also not born in the UK.

3. I really don't care about Lance Armstrong.  Wait!  I saw the TV documentary Stop at Nothing, and I see now that he's a clinical psychotic.  This is actually pretty rational, and shouldn't be on this list.

4. Trek's president, John Burke, is a jerk.  He forced Greg Lemond to apologize for claiming that Armstrong was doping.  And yet, when Lemond turned out to be right, what did he do?  Nothing.  He did nothing.

5. Treks are the most boring bikes made on this planet.  Also, Specializeds are the most boring bikes made on this planet.  If I see you riding either one, know that I am secretly judging you.

6. I will not name my bikes nor will I refer to them as "rigs," "steeds," or "whips," because doing so is silly.  (it's cool if you name your bike though, I don't mind) Bicycles are damn cool on their own and do not need to be compared to other vehicles.

Picture
7. This bend in the downtube, which seemingly every current bike has?  I can't stand it.  Yes it saves the downtube from getting smacked by the fork in a crash, but I don't care, it's ugly.

Also, if there is also a bend in the downtube at the bottom bracket, thus creating an S-shaped downtube, that's even worse.
8. The following modem technology is dumb and does not work; lockouts on suspension, tubeless tires, super wide handlebars, press fit bottom brackets, 3D printed frames.

I bet you expected to see Strava on this list didn't you?  I actually like it.  Not because I need to be the quickest on any stretch of road - I know that's not going to happen - but because I love looking at maps of where I've ridden, and where everyone else rides.

That should do for now, but I may need to add things in the future.  Right now, it's beer:30.
0 Comments

vintage wheel size

8/1/2014

0 Comments

 
I was chatting with my neighbour the other day, and he made a comment that was really innocuous at the time, but when I thought about it really quite telling about the state of the industry.

He’s a rider too I should mention – has a Giant enduro-type bike from a couple years ago.

We were discussing the end of the 26″ wheel.  I mentioned that I have a set of Mavic XC717 rims, and they’re probably the last high-quality, rim brake compatible, 26″ rims made.  He said; “Soon there won’t be any good 26″ stuff left for us...”

For starters, I didn’t realize that we were united in facing down the bike industry, but that’s cool; it’s always good to have allies.  Also, I thought he was building a 29er hardtail this season, so I know he’s leaning towards the darkside.  But in the end he is right – 26ers are dead.

Except for aggressive trail bikes and DH racers, you won’t find any 26″ bikes over $700 this year.  And all the ‘just ride what you want and have fun!’ type sentiment you can muster won’t help that very soon, companies won’t have any reason to make new 26″ wheel parts.

What’s going to be interesting is; what happens to the market value of 26″ bikes?  If you can’t get a good fork, or a good set of wheels for a decent used bike, would you buy it?  Good bikes are always going to be worth buying, but what good is a mid range 26″ hardtail with blown fork seals or a bent rim?

There is a guy in town here that has been trying to sell a set of Mavic Crossmax wheels.  They cost $900 in their day, but he’s had to steadily drop his price from $250 to $150.  I would be all over them if I hadn’t been (subconsciously) stockpiling quality 26″ wheelsets, but I still wonder if even $150 isn’t over priced.

Hopefully companies that make spokes and rim will continue to do so for 26″ wheels, but for these system wheels like the Crossmax, and the Cane Creek WAM, and the Shimano XTR wheels I bought a couple weeks ago, how long will they have stock of the special spokes required? I would be stunned if you can still buy the rims required for that XTR set.

What will probably happen, is the good stuff will go underground.  Just like today, if you want to find good vintage stuff, you have to go to a vintage website, it probably won’t be long before there are 26er websites where you can trade high-end 26er wheels and forks.

I should start up a website, get in on the ground floor you know?  teamcow26.com?

0 Comments

    Author

    I'm 80. I wrench more than I ride and I like it that way.

    Archives

    May 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Beer
    Domination
    Meme
    Mountain Bikes
    Road Racing
    Rocky Mountain
    Specialized
    Strava
    Tires
    Vintage
    Wheel Size
    You A Fool

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.